EHR Use Projected to Increase – Is Your PACS Software Ready?

2012-06-25
 

PACS Software Upgrade Do top-notch electronic health records (EHRs) and non-digital medical imaging go together?

Not really. And that’s why every medical facility making the switch to EHRs needs to think seriously about investing in – or possibly upgrading – PACS software.

There’s no doubt that the switch to EHRs is happening quickly. One study predicts an $8.3 billion global EHR market by 2016 (representing annual 12 percent growth from a $6.5 billion market in 2012) while another says $9.1 billion, with over 10 percent of that from ambulatory clinics.

What’s behind such numbers? In the U.S. and other countries, governments are funding EHR conversion efforts as a way to improve medical care and decrease overall healthcare budgets. But medical professionals also see the immediate benefits of records that are comprehensive, accessible anywhere within a system, easily transferable to other medical facilities, and designed to red-flag threats to patient safety.

They also see that it doesn’t make sense to go digital on medical records without going digital in radiology. After all, X-rays, CT scans, MRIs, and other medical imaging procedures are just as much a part of  a patient’s medical history as a list of a his or her current medications, allergies, and procedures.

But if a doctor, nurse, or other medical imaging professional can’t easily access pictures and videos, they are trying to care for a patient with a partial blinder on.

The solution: PACS software – or, if older PACS software can’t interface with a new EHR, a PACS software upgrade.

Is it time for your medical facility to improve your EHR with PACS software or a PACS software upgrade? If the prognosticators are right, that’s a nearly $9 billion question.

For more on PACS software and other medical imaging news, subscribe to the Medical Imaging Talk blog via RSS feed or email. Or follow us on Twitter.

One Response to “EHR Use Projected to Increase – Is Your PACS Software Ready?”

  1. Don says:

    I’m not sure how upgrading PACS alone helps with EHR integration.

    Typically the image reports are coming from a RIS or HL7 dictation system, which is separate from PACS. The RIS would then communicate with the EHR via a direct HL7 interface or via an interface engine. The PACS would need some type of HL7/DICOM broker in order to receive information from the RIS.

    The even bigger obstacle in all of the is the integration piece between all of those entities.

    I agree integrating RIS with an EHR is a great idea, but it is much bigger than ‘upgrading’ PACS – thanks for the article

    -don

Leave a Reply