Medical Imaging Workflow
Medical Imaging Workflow
As the healthcare landscape continues to prioritize interoperability, data sharing and value-based care, the efficiency and flexibility of your medical imaging workflow is key. With this shift in healthcare, organizations must solve the challenges of simultaneously increasing efficiencies, reducing costs and maintaining patient care.
From a variety of McKesson industry experts and guest authors, get insight on key concerns for healthcare leaders, ranging from how to help your radiologists redefine their roles to improving your diagnostic imaging department. Read the articles below to begin improving your medical imaging workflow today.
Quality Workflows, Enterprise Worklists & Workflow Automation: Workflow intelligence helps align radiologists and the enterprise9:56 am
Editor’s Note: This article by Evan Godt recently ran on the Imaging Biz health IT portal and is reprinted here with permission.
Quality Workflows, Enterprise Worklists & Workflow Automation: Workflow intelligence helps align radiologists and the enterprise
As the U.S. shifts further into the era of accountable care, hitting quality benchmarks becomes ever more important. Reimbursement is increasingly tied to the value generated by providers, and data about who is making the grade is becoming more transparent.
Knowing this, it’s a powerful capability to recognize an issue before it arises, rather than retroactively during a meeting weeks later.
In this era of instant gratification, patients now expect near-instantaneous response rates. Improving the speed and accuracy of diagnoses fundamentally serves to foster increased patient health and satisfaction, while helping to prevent future chronic conditions. Healthcare organizations can also help reduce costs and share savings by maintaining a focus on improving care outcomes.
Because of this shift in patient expectations, there is a renewed focus on producing faster and more accurate diagnoses.
The Conserus™ Clinical Data Exchange helps imaging communities evolve into modern diagnostic environments by enabling direct lines of sight into comprehensive and informed views of patient conditions.
Editor’s Note: This article recently appeared on the Diagnostic Imaging web site and is reprinted here with permission.
The transition to value-based care is expected to be a lofty one for the radiology field. When outlining the struggles, the focus tends to be on how radiology can define value. While defining value is an overwhelming feat, it’s not radiology’s only challenge in the new payment model. Diagnostic Imaging spoke with Tomer Levy, general manager of workflow infrastructure at McKesson Imaging & Workflow Solutions (IWS), about what other challenges radiology can expect to face in the future of health care delivery.
Imaging technology is quickly charting a path toward interoperability for the enterprise, allowing hospitals and patients to access clinical data and images in real time. This represents a new era for medical imaging solutions, but how can hospital executives manage these new resources?
Don Dennison, president/principle, Don K. Dennison Solutions, Inc., and Director-at-large on the Board of Directors for the Society of Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM), recently sought to answer this question at the McKesson Executive Leadership Summit.
Dennison first looked to identify the three trends that currently affect the imaging industry, along with three steps that hospital executives can take to achieve interoperability with their imaging solutions.
Sneak Peek at Insight 2015 Presentation: Best Practices for Imaging Integration and Interoperability10:30 am
Four challenges looked at carefully by 13 prominent healthcare IT experts — that’s the basis for a recent McKesson ebook and the subject of a dynamic presentation on imaging integration and interoperability being planned for the CIO Forum at Insight 2015 on Tuesday, September 15. InSight is the independent user group conference for McKesson customers.
Here are the challenges:
- Managing total cost of ownership
- Improving productivity and workflow
- Supporting compliance
- Transitioning from volume- to value-based care
Since the first PACS was developed in the early 1980s, medical imaging systems have continued to improve. Monitors have higher resolutions for viewing clarity. Images have 3D capabilities. Faster network speeds allow for more efficient image access.
In the 30-plus years since the construction of PACS, healthcare is now seeing its demise — or evolution. In this Q&A, industry consultant and speaker Don Dennison discusses the drive behind PACS’ evolution, what healthcare leaders need to consider and benefits organizations can gain.
Q: What is driving the need to “deconstruct” PACS?
Editor’s Note: This article was previously published on Imaging Technology News and is reprinted here with permission.
OSF HealthCare, an 11-hospital, 52-site, 138-year-old Catholic system based in Peoria, Ill., is recognized among Medicare’s Pioneer Accountable Care Organizations. As such they are constantly looking to improve care quality while reducing costs — all with an eye on transitioning, as all U.S. healthcare providers must, from volume-based to value-based care.
In this case study, Steve Kastelein, manager of diagnostic imaging applications for OSF HealthCare, discusses some of the overarching challenges they are facing.
It’s 1:00am on a Saturday. A patient comes into the emergency room complaining of cough and severe chest pain — hallmark symptoms of pneumonia. The attending physician calls for a chest X-ray. After making a preliminary read of the film, and seeing airspace opacity, the physician says that pneumonia is likely despite the lack of fever. But no radiologist will be available to review the X-ray and confirm the diagnosis until business hours the following day. The patient is sent home with oral antibiotics and instructions to drink plenty of fluids and rest. It’s a common enough story. One that can happen in any emergency department, any night of the week.
It’s never a comfortable moment when you’re trying to make a point and someone’s response is, “Prove it.” Yet that’s the discussion radiologists have been having lately, and the conversation about the value of their work is ongoing.
Proving value is complex — but certainly not impossible. Radiology data is one aspect of that proof; moving radiologists into a more prominent role is another. “We need to become better doctors—real doctors, if you will — who provide real value to our patients, our referring doctors and our hospitals,” said Dr. David Levin, professor and chairman emeritus of the Department of Radiology at Jefferson Medical College and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital in Philadelphia at RSNA 2014. “We’ve let ourselves become the invisible doctors, and that is something none of us are happy about.”
When it comes to doing a job well, the right tool can make all the difference. Researchers, including Dr. Bradley Erickson at Mayo Clinic, suggest that PACS and RIS are not sufficient for the entire job. At last year’s RSNA conference, Erickson remarked that too many healthcare professionals are using databases for workflow, which begs the question, why aren’t we using workflow engines for workflow? “Use the right tool. Don’t use a hammer to pound in a screw,” he said.